HP Prime integration issue
|
02-12-2021, 08:04 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
HP Prime integration issue
Hello, when I try to integrate 1/(x^3-2) with respect to x, I see in my answer something with rootof(). When I try to retype this into the calculator, I receive a syntax error, presumably because the first argument has 6 parameters, and the second argument has 7 parameters. What does this even mean? What does this function even mean? There's clearly an elementary representation of this integral (just type it on wolfram alpha, for example). I can't even replicate or approximate the result because I get a syntax error when even pressing enter to see what it looks like in long form. What's happening here?
|
|||
02-12-2021, 10:53 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP Prime integration issue
Hi, LCieParagon
I asked this before, and you are not supposed to see rootof(...) in Prime. see https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-11...#pid105773 For your example, we can do a simple substitution, x = 2^(1/3)*y, dx = 2^(1/3)*dy (y integral result copy/pasted from Hp Prime emulator) I = ∫(1/(x^3-2), x) = 2^(1/3)/2 * ∫(1/(y^3-1), y) = 2^(1/3)/2 * (-atan((y+1/2)/(1/2*√3))/√3 - 1/6*ln(y^2+y+1) + 1/3*ln(abs(y-1))) Back substitute y = x/2^(1/3), and we are done. --- The reason for substitution is y^3-1 = (y-1)*(y-w)*(y-w²), where w = exp(i*2*pi/3) 3/(y^3-1) = 1/(y-1) + w/(y-w) + w²/(y-w²) I = 2^(1/3)/6 · ∫(3/(y^3-1), y) = 2^(1/3)/6 · (ln(y-1) + w·ln(y-w) + w²·ln(y-w²)) |
|||
02-13-2021, 02:02 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP Prime integration issue
(02-12-2021 10:53 PM)Albert Chan Wrote: Hi, LCieParagon “I’m not supposed to see this in Prime”, but I do see it, and it doesn’t make sense to me. I can use simple algebra to do this integral by hand and while it looks pretty ugly, it’s actually not difficult to do. I can’t even simplify it because one matrix has a 7 parameter argument, and one 6. I can’t replace the empty spot with a 0, else I receive a wrong answer. There is no literature on rootof function on the HP Prime. I consider this a bug and should be fixed. I’m a math professor and this result is less than useless to me especially when a competitor calculator computes it in seconds. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)