Yet another pandigital approximation (just for fun)

[rprosperi]

(10-01-2014 03:50 AM)Paul Dale Wrote:  

(10-01-2014 02:33 AM)rprosperi Wrote:  I don't follow much of the math you guys discuss, so.... why is this expressed in the format shown, since the fraction reduces to 10691 / 462?

The numbers are palindromic -- i.e. they read the same forwards as they do backwards.


Pauli

OH! That palindromic! Yes, a closer reading may have eliminated that silly question. Ahem...