Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
|
08-21-2017, 01:42 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
Prime Factorization on Casio CLASSWIZ emulator somehow gave result as prime for (191373191) whereas HP 12C prime factor program result 1237 x 15467
Gamo |
|||
08-21-2017, 02:10 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
The manual for the Casio says that it cannot factor a value if "two or more of the prime factors of the value have more than three digits". The display will indicate when factoring is incomplete: "The part that cannot be factored will be enclosed in parentheses on the display."
Try factoring 1009^2. According to the manual, it should fail to factor. <0|ɸ|0> -Joe- |
|||
08-21-2017, 09:23 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
Hello Joe Horn
Interesting to know that the maximum 3 digits prime for Casio Classwiz is it limit otherwise all other features is excellent. Gamo |
|||
08-21-2017, 10:37 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
(08-21-2017 01:42 AM)Gamo Wrote: Prime Factorization on Casio CLASSWIZ emulator somehow gave result as prime for (191373191) whereas HP 12C prime factor program result 1237 x 15467 Both results are wrong. 191373191 is not prime, it is 12373 x 15467. Which 12C program returns 1237 and 15467 as prime factors? Or was this just a typo? Dieter |
|||
08-21-2017, 12:47 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
(08-21-2017 10:37 AM)Dieter Wrote: Both results are wrong. 191373191 is not prime, it is 12373 x 15467. He might have been referring to my program, 1237 is a typo. |
|||
08-21-2017, 02:23 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Prime Factor - Casio Classwiz VS HP 12C
Sorry guys that was a typo
191373191 = 12373 and 15467 Gamo |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)