Poll: Best Model for Quick Number Crunching This poll is closed. |
|||
HP 11C | 6 | 3.77% | |
HP 15C | 33 | 20.75% | |
HP 32S | 10 | 6.29% | |
HP 41C | 16 | 10.06% | |
HP 42S | 27 | 16.98% | |
HP 48S/G, HP 50G | 28 | 17.61% | |
HP Prime | 12 | 7.55% | |
Other | 27 | 16.98% | |
Total | 159 votes | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
|
02-08-2024, 03:23 AM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
HP 30b (I use RPN mode) is convenient for most small number crunching problems, display is quite readable from a variety of angles, keys are good, 6 stat models. For more sophisticated problems, my HP 42S is a go to. Less friendly as far as viewing angles go to read the display. Keys are great. Both units are perfect size for a shirt pocket. For graphing, I like the CASIO fx-CG 50, love that one can have each grid line on a graph labeled. A larger device, but works for a pants pocket. The CASIO fx-991-CW packs a lot into a small package, uses 17-21 significant digits in its calculations, requires using menus a bit more than the 42S. Shirt pocket size, but is prone to fall out of a shirt pocket, better in a pants pocket.
|
|||
02-08-2024, 10:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2024 10:40 PM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
Now that they’re all smartphone-based, grabbing any model is a couple steps, I’m grabbing whatever my fingers click on.
In all seriousness though: Classic: 67 Woodstock: 25C Spice/Spike: 32E From Cuvee On a side note: (02-08-2024 03:23 AM)lrdheat Wrote: The CASIO fx-991-CW packs a lot into a small package, uses 17-21 significant digits in its calculations, requires using menus a bit more than the 42S. Shirt pocket size, but is prone to fall out of a shirt pocket, better in a pants pocket. Although the CW gets a ton of gruff, What are your thoughts about and pluses for the 991 CW? |
|||
02-09-2024, 10:34 AM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
I voted "32s" and "other", as for the time being, I'm mostly "playing" with my WP43 and DM32.
Esben 15C CE, 28s, 35s, 49G+, 50G, Prime G2 HW D, SwissMicros DM32, DM42, DM42n, WP43 Pilot Elektronika MK-52 & MK-61 |
|||
02-09-2024, 10:38 AM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
Well, the HP35S is not present in the poll as an option, and my heart is bleeding...
Put a calculator into your life! |
|||
02-09-2024, 11:22 AM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
For me : 41C, Prime and others (C47 & WP43)
|
|||
02-09-2024, 08:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024 08:32 PM by johnb.)
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
Even though I'm actually more likely to reach for my 15c/CE now, I still voted for the 11c plus the 48g/50g.
My reasoning:
Daily drivers: 15c, 32sII, 35s, 41cx, 48g, WP 34s/31s. Favorite: 16c. Latest: 15ce, 48s, 50g. Gateway drug: 28s found in yard sale ~2009. |
|||
02-09-2024, 08:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024 08:46 PM by johnb.)
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
(02-06-2024 08:33 AM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote: For me, "number crunching" always had the meaning of "the large-scale processing of numerical data". This is the definition in the Collins English Dictionary that my wife, who teaches English at school, uses for work. Therefore my choice for "Quick Number Crunching" would be the HP Frontier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontier_(supercomputer)) :-) Today I learned: Cray, Inc. is a subsidiary of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Seymour Cray was the chief designer of the 6xxx and Cyber series of supercomputers at Control Data, before he left to start Cray Corp. The thing I first learned to program on was Ga. Tech's Cyber 74 mainframe (in Fortran-IV !!) when I was just shy of 13 years old. So the Frontier can trace its lineage straight back to my first computer. They say that baby ducklings bond to the first thing they see upon hatching from the egg, and from then on, that's their "Mother." I wonder if it works the same way for Programmers? Daily drivers: 15c, 32sII, 35s, 41cx, 48g, WP 34s/31s. Favorite: 16c. Latest: 15ce, 48s, 50g. Gateway drug: 28s found in yard sale ~2009. |
|||
02-13-2024, 11:14 PM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching | |||
02-24-2024, 03:33 PM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
I'm currently using a 12c at work and a 35s at home.
|
|||
02-24-2024, 06:05 PM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
HP 30b
|
|||
02-24-2024, 06:06 PM
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
(RPN mode)
|
|||
02-24-2024, 08:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2024 08:46 PM by AndiGer.)
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
As I don‘t need more than the 4 basic calculations at work I use the Monroe 620 nixie tube calculatorwith one memory on my desk
? For convenience I use the HP67 simulator Or HP45, HP41 or HP70 hardware that are a few steps aside |
|||
02-25-2024, 04:52 PM
Post: #33
|
|||
|
|||
MY Preferred Models
There is always an HP 200LX open on my home desk, so that's probably the most commonly used.
In my backpack there is an HP 17B II and it gets plenty of use too. My habit has been to always log my gasoline purchases and calculate the fuel efficiency as miles per gallon, so this would be its most common type of calculations. |
|||
02-28-2024, 01:41 AM
Post: #34
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
I really enjoy my 28c/s. I didn’t pick other because I feel like these models are under appreciated. I use my physical machines and there is wonderful iOS emulator as well.
I am really enjoying my HP Prime too. I use both the physical and emulator. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)