Tripartite Palindromic Partition of Integer (HP 50g) Challenge
|
04-09-2023, 02:47 AM
Post: #107
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Tripartite Palindromic Partition of Integer (HP 50g) Challenge
By optimization, it seems that you mean converting the user RPL program to use stack operations as far as possible (instead of using local variables). Is that correct?
I compared the speed of my version of ALGO1 vs your streamlined version. The time taken to execute the algorithm on an input corresponding to the number 2345678 is 0.95-0.97 seconds vs. 0.99-1.03 seconds (on a physical 50g). Although there is a marginal improvement in execution time (2-7%), there is a severe loss in readability especially if you are comparing the code to the algorithm in the paper so my question is - is it worth doing this? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)