Constant Vector as Argument in PPL
|
06-19-2024, 12:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-19-2024 12:14 AM by ftneek.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL
Mentioning the behavior of the Prime across hardware versions/firmware revisions can help the developers pinpoint when a bug is introduced, making it easier to track down and fix.
Indeed, on a physical calculator the program behaves as you describe while normalize([0,0,-1]) correctly returns [0,0,-1] in Home view. I will file a ticket on the bug tracker, let's hope it can be resolved. - neek |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - NumericDavid - 06-17-2024, 07:53 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - BruceH - 06-18-2024, 10:00 AM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - ftneek - 06-18-2024, 06:39 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - NumericDavid - 06-18-2024, 08:09 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - ftneek - 06-18-2024, 09:05 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - NumericDavid - 06-18-2024, 10:01 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - ftneek - 06-19-2024 12:10 AM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - NumericDavid - 06-22-2024, 07:10 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - komame - 06-22-2024, 08:34 PM
RE: Constant Vector as Argument in PPL - NumericDavid - 06-22-2024, 07:23 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)