Post Reply 
CASIO fx-CG50
03-04-2018, 09:26 PM
Post: #10
RE: CASIO fx-CG50
I'm wondering if Eddie tried something like sin 1+2i instead of sin (1+2i). The first case would be interpreted as (sin 1) + 2i. This would produce an answer that looks like complex numbers are supported, but is really sin 1 which is ~.84 plus i. Sin (1+2i) produces a non real error. The Prime produces in home, ~3.17+~1.96i.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-02-2018, 10:08 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-02-2018, 10:15 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - sacredcow - 03-03-2018, 02:31 AM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-03-2018, 06:16 AM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - sacredcow - 03-03-2018, 09:25 AM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - Eddie W. Shore - 03-03-2018, 03:54 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-03-2018, 04:29 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - ijabbott - 03-04-2018, 09:14 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - Eddie W. Shore - 03-03-2018, 05:06 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - ijabbott - 03-04-2018, 09:36 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-04-2018 09:26 PM
RE: CASIO fx-CG50 - lrdheat - 03-04-2018, 09:28 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)