Post Reply 
Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
04-28-2018, 08:03 PM (This post was last modified: 04-28-2018 08:03 PM by Dol.)
Post: #1
Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
Just for fun,

could we make a HP42 program that fills a 5x5 matrix
given an input between 65-300 ending with a 0 or a 5 where
row, colum and diagonal sum equal to the input number like Miguel?

For reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0Sfe1BGjQE

Good luck!

Fredrik
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2018, 08:14 PM
Post: #2
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
If I have to guess, it is the 5x5 magic square, where the magic number is 65. Then one can scale the numbers and the condition of having a multiple of 5 helps redistributing the numbers.

But that's a guess. In any case the algorithms would be interesting.

Wikis are great, Contribute :)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2018, 10:18 PM
Post: #3
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-28-2018 08:14 PM)pier4r Wrote:  If I have to guess, it is the 5x5 magic square, where the magic number is 65. Then one can scale the numbers and the condition of having a multiple of 5 helps redistributing the numbers.

But that's a guess. In any case the algorithms would be interesting.

Exactly. The kid just needs to remember *one* 5x5 magic square formed by the numbers 1 to 25 (which is very easy because of the symmetries, no need to remember the contents of the 25 locations), which thus has a magic sum of 65 for every row, column and both main diagonals, and then adds a constant to every number where the constant is simply the provided number less the magic constant and the result divided into 5 (which is why the provided number has to end in 0 or 5 lest the division into 5 would fail to give an integer result).

For instance, in the video he is given 265. He just subtracts from it the fixed magic constant 65, which gives 200, the divides this into 5, which is 40. He then adds 40 to every number from 1 to 25, which gives numbers from 41 to 65, and proceeds to very theatrically fill up the locations in some haphazard order, just for effect. He could actually fill them up in a few seconds left to right, top to bottom, without the theatrics and the "checks" but there you are.

In short, a lame theatrical act which doesn't require any mathematical skills whatsoever, let alone "genius", and a minimal amount of memory. As for the algorithm, it is anything but interesting: a few HP42S steps or about 2-3 lines of HP-71B code, at most. Execution time (one subtraction, one division, and 25 sums, all integer) is essentially 0.

Regards.
V.
.

  
All My Articles & other Materials here:  Valentin Albillo's HP Collection
 
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2018, 10:32 PM
Post: #4
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
Quote:In short, a lame theatrical act which doesn't require any mathematical skills whatsoever, let alone "genius", and a minimal amount of memory. As for the algorithm, it is anything but interesting: a few HP42S steps or about 2-3 lines of HP-71B code, at most. Execution time (one subtraction, one division, and 25 sums, all integer) is essentially 0.

you should out him in the youtube comments Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2018, 11:26 PM
Post: #5
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-28-2018 10:32 PM)Zaphod Wrote:  you should out him in the youtube comments Big Grin

Nope, I'm not in the business of shaming anyone publicly, least of all a very young kid. He probably makes a living out of it and who knows, perhaps he'll develop a genuine interest in mathematics as he grows up.

All the same, to put my code where my mouth is, this is a 3-line, 150-byte routine for the HP-71B:

10 DATA 17,24,1,8,15,23,5,7,14,16,4,6,13,20,22,10,12,19,21,3,11,18,25,2,9
20 DESTROY ALL @ OPTION BASE 1 @ DIM A(5,5),B(5,5) @ READ A @ INPUT N
30 MAT B=((N-65)/5) @ MAT A=A+B @ MAT DISP USING "2D,2X";A

>RUN
? 265

57 64 41 48 55
63 45 47 54 56
44 46 53 60 62
50 52 59 61 43
51 58 65 42 49

>RUN
? 65

17 24 1 8 15
23 5 7 14 16
4 6 13 20 22
10 12 19 21 3
11 18 25 2 9

>RUN
? 300

64 71 48 55 62
70 52 54 61 63
51 53 60 67 69
57 59 66 68 50
58 65 72 49 56


A conversion to run in the HP42S is utterly straightforward and will be left as an exercise to the reader.

Regards.
V.
.

  
All My Articles & other Materials here:  Valentin Albillo's HP Collection
 
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-30-2018, 09:09 AM
Post: #6
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-28-2018 10:18 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  The kid just needs to remember *one* 5x5 magic square formed by the numbers 1 to 25 (which is very easy because of the symmetries, no need to remember the contents of the 25 locations),

Would you elaborate a bit more on the bolded?
I'd like to know how to do that.

Thanks,
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-30-2018, 11:27 AM
Post: #7
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
Here’s a quick hack to create a magic square of odd order:
Code:
00 { 77-Byte Prgm }
01▸LBL "MAGIC"
02 ENTER
03 NEWMAT
04 EDIT
05 LASTX
06 X↑2
07 1
08 LASTX
09 1
10 +
11 2
12 ÷
13 STOIJ
14 R↑
15▸LBL 02
16 ENTER
17 ↑
18 FS? 77
19 GTO 01
20 FS? 76
21 GTO 00
22 ←
23 FC? 77
24 GTO 02
25 J-
26 I+
27 GTO 00
28▸LBL 02
29 FS? 76
30 ↓
31 X=0?
32 GTO 00
33 J+
34▸LBL 01
35 I+
36 I+
37▸LBL 00
38 R↓
39 DSE ST X
40 GTO 02
41 RCLEL
42 EXITALL
43 END

Cheers, Werner

41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-30-2018, 02:20 PM (This post was last modified: 04-30-2018 04:14 PM by Gerson W. Barbosa.)
Post: #8
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-30-2018 11:27 AM)Werner Wrote:  Here’s a quick hack to create a magic square of odd order:
Code:
00 { 77-Byte Prgm }
01▸LBL "MAGIC"
02 ENTER
03 NEWMAT
04 EDIT
05 LASTX
06 X↑2
07 1
08 LASTX
09 1
10 +
11 2
12 ÷
13 STOIJ
14 R↑
15▸LBL 02
16 ENTER
17 ↑
18 FS? 77
19 GTO 01
20 FS? 76
21 GTO 00
22 ←
23 FC? 77
24 GTO 02
25 J-
26 I+
27 GTO 00
28▸LBL 02
29 FS? 76
30 ↓
31 X=0?
32 GTO 00
33 J+
34▸LBL 01
35 I+
36 I+
37▸LBL 00
38 R↓
39 DSE ST X
40 GTO 02
41 RCLEL
42 EXITALL
43 END

Thanks for doing the harder part! Here is an easier add-on:

Code:

00 { 33-Byte Prgm }
01▸LBL "MAG2"
02 RCL ST Y
03 DIM?
04 R↓
05 2
06 1/X
07 X<>Y
08 ×
09 LASTX
10 X↑2
11 NOT
12 BASE+/-
13 ×
14 -
15 RCL ST Y
16 DIM?
17 R↓
18 ÷
19 +
20 END

Examples:

1)

5 XEQ MAGIC
265 XEQ MAG2

2)

3 XEQ MAGIC
27 XEQ MAG2

—>

08 13 06

07 09 11

12 05 10


Gerson.

=========

PS:

k = constant of the magic square (265 in the TV show)

m = n(n^2 + 1)/2; magic constant of the original magic square (whose elements start with 1)

n = order of the square

c = (k - m)/n; constant to be added to each element of the original magic square so that the new magic sum is k

Notice that k must be equal or greater than m and be divisible by n

The sums, except the diagonals, can be checked with RSUM:

ENTER
RSUM
X<>Y
TRANS
RSUM


Just for fun, another example:

101 XEQ MAGIC
260176505 XEQ MAG2

Runs instantly on Free42 on my smartphone :-)

Edited to delete the last three or four lines (there was no need to preserve Werner’s original matrix anymore).
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-30-2018, 06:00 PM
Post: #9
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
Some optimization, same usage:

Code:

00 { 25-Byte Prgm }
01▸LBL "MAG2"
02 RCL ST Y
03 DIM?
04 X↑2
05 NOT
06 BASE+/-
07 R↓
08 ÷
09 R↑
10 2
11 ÷
12 -
13 +
14 END

Perhaps we should combine both programs for best efficiency.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-30-2018, 10:50 PM
Post: #10
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-30-2018 09:09 AM)RMollov Wrote:  
(04-28-2018 10:18 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  The kid just needs to remember *one* 5x5 magic square formed by the numbers 1 to 25 (which is very easy because of the symmetries, no need to remember the contents of the 25 locations),
Would you elaborate a bit more on the bolded?
I'd like to know how to do that.

This is the very magic square the kid uses as a basis, later adding the computed constant to all its elements. First notice this easy-to-remember Z pattern along the diagonal:

10-11-12-13-14-15-16:

17  24   1   8  15
23   5   7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


This takes care of 7 numbers (by the way, the central element, 13, is simply the magic constant (65) divided by the order of the square (5): 65/5 = 13).

Next notice the patterns in the smaller diagonals:

4-5-6-7-8:

17  24   1   8  15
23     7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


and 18-19-20-21-22:

17  24   1   8  15
23   5   7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


This already takes care of the locations of 17 of the 25 numbers and the remaining 8 also belong to patterns (2,3, ... , 23,24, etc.)

Notice also that all elements placed symmetrically in respect to the center one add up to 26. For instance, the four corners 17 and 9 (17+9=26), 15 and 11 (15+11=26), and all the rest too (24+2, 1+25, 8+18, 4+22, 10+16, etc), so you'd only need to remember half the locations plus the fact that 13 is the center one (as explained before).

In short, the whole 5x5 magic square can be remembered with very minimal effort after memorizing a few patterns and the symmetry x+x' = 26. After a little practice you'll get the hang of it.

V.
.

  
All My Articles & other Materials here:  Valentin Albillo's HP Collection
 
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2018, 11:14 AM
Post: #11
RE: Is HP42 smarter than a kid on TV?
(04-30-2018 10:50 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  This is the very magic square the kid uses as a basis, later adding the computed constant to all its elements. First notice this easy-to-remember Z pattern along the diagonal:

10-11-12-13-14-15-16:

17  24   1   8  15
23   5   7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


This takes care of 7 numbers (by the way, the central element, 13, is simply the magic constant (65) divided by the order of the square (5): 65/5 = 13).

Next notice the patterns in the smaller diagonals:

4-5-6-7-8:

17  24   1   8  15
23     7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


and 18-19-20-21-22:

17  24   1   8  15
23   5   7  14  16
 4   6  13  20  22
10  12  19  21   3
11  18  25   2   9


This already takes care of the locations of 17 of the 25 numbers and the remaining 8 also belong to patterns (2,3, ... , 23,24, etc.)

Notice also that all elements placed symmetrically in respect to the center one add up to 26. For instance, the four corners 17 and 9 (17+9=26), 15 and 11 (15+11=26), and all the rest too (24+2, 1+25, 8+18, 4+22, 10+16, etc), so you'd only need to remember half the locations plus the fact that 13 is the center one (as explained before).

In short, the whole 5x5 magic square can be remembered with very minimal effort after memorizing a few patterns and the symmetry x+x' = 26. After a little practice you'll get the hang of it.

V.
.

Thanks a lot, Valentin, that makes perfect sense now. Much appreciated.
Cheers,
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)