(42S) Quotient and Remainder
|
04-05-2023, 09:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023 11:54 AM by Werner.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
(42S) Quotient and Remainder
[Updated to use floor-divide. X and/or Y may be negative, and Y = Q*X+R holds when possible]
The 41C version was easy, but here we have to solve the halfway problem, eg: Y: 8e11+2 X: 4 must return Q: 2E11 R: 2 but Y: 8e11+6 X: 4 must return Q: 2E11+1 R: 2 In the first case, the division rounds down, in the second it rounds up. Thanks to Albert Chan for the halfway correcting algorithm. (which I adapted so I could keep on using IP instead of FLOOR) split Y = Q*X + R t := X/Y; Q := INT(t); R := MOD(Y,X); if t#Q then return(R,Q); t := X - R; if t<R then Q:= Q - 1; if t=R then Q:= Q - MOD(FLOOR(MOD(Y,X*10)/X),2); /* equals IP(MOD(MOD(Y,X*10)/X,2)) */ return(R,Q); Code: @ given X and Y, determine Quotient DIV(Y,X) and Remainder MOD(Y,X) will work for X and Y integers, abs(X)<1e12 and abs(Y)<=X*1e12 I confess I haven't tried it with fractional inputs, but that should also work. Counterexamples welcome, I think ;-) As with the 41 code, this routine will work when Q can be represented with 12 digits eg Y=1e40 and X=6 will not work. Cheers, Werner 41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE |
|||
04-05-2023, 12:39 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
Hi, Werner
It had been 2 years. I provided 2 versions for floor-divide #1: we assumed "normal" division was round-to-nearest, half-way-to-even. The trick is to reverse engineer how it was done, and reverse the "damage". (12-20-2020 03:22 AM)Albert Chan Wrote: To handle signs of a, b, correction test: remainder(a,b)/b < 0 and q-1 or q #2: more direct way, based from FMA(-q, b, a) = -q*b + a Fixing q (for floor-divide) is similar: FMA(-q, b, a)/b < 0 and q-1 or q The downside is that 42S does not have FMA (almost no calculator does ...) Free42/Plus42 only had it recently (Free42 version ≥ 2.5.23, all Plus42 versions) (01-08-2021 05:24 PM)Albert Chan Wrote: FMA based DIV behave the same as my REM based DIV. Click on the green arrow for floor-divide code. Note that Free42/Plus42 (42S too?) MOD is really floor-mod. Q should be floor-quotient to match. Example, Python use floor-divide/floor-mod: divmod(y,x) == (y//x, y%x) >>> Y, X = 8*10**11+2, 4 >>> divmod(-Y, X) (-200000000001L, 2L) >>> divmod(Y, -X) (-200000000001L, -2L) OP code, it seems Q is truncated quotient, R is floor-mod. Or, if you want truncated quotient, R should match that. Either way, invariant Y = Q*X+R should hold. (-Y) (X) "RQ" --> (-2e11) (+2) ? (Y) (-X) "RQ" --> (-2e11) (-2) ? |
|||
04-05-2023, 01:11 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
(04-05-2023 12:39 PM)Albert Chan Wrote: >>> Y, X = 8*10**11+2, 4Hi Albert, My RQ routine matches the results above? remark that I do use Q:= Q - MOD(FLOOR(MOD(Y,X*10)/X),2); but I switched FLOOR and MOD around, then I could use IP: Q := Q - IP(MOD(MOD(Y,X*10)/X,2)) ; the results of MOD(Y,X*10)/X and the corresponding adjustment of Q (0 or 1) are -3.5 - 0 -2.5 - 1 -1.5 - 0 -0.5 - 1 0.5 - 0 1.5 - 1 2.5 - 0 whether you now do MOD(FLOOR(X),2) or IP(MOD(X,2)) is the same. ah but the initial IP should also be FLOOR then I see. (don't get me wrong, but your explanations are sometimes a bit short, and I don't understand, or understand wrongly ;-) I wanted to: - use only the stack - return X in LASTX - be fast for simple cases, exceptions last. That ruled out many of your suggestion algorithms, eg the one with remainder, or FMA. I still have to do the Free42/DM42 one where I will be able to use FMA; I will correct the routines, thanks Cheers, Werner 41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE |
|||
04-05-2023, 01:48 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
Hi, Werner
Sorry if I was a bit unclear. Python code only tried to show invariant, Y = Q*X + R, always hold. It does not ask for QR code to match it. Truncated quotient is fine, but should match with truncated remainder. Quote:I still have to do the Free42/DM42 one where I will be able to use FMA; I like the FMA approach. It is simple and direct. (Y-Q*X)/X = Y/X - Q The expression is simply the fractional part that was rounded-off. For floor-divide, simply make sure fractional part is non-negative. |
|||
04-05-2023, 03:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-05-2023 04:52 PM by Werner.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
So, to work for negative X and/or Y, the algorithm should become:
(changes in red) t := X/Y; Q := FLOOR(t); R := MOD(Y,X); if t#Q then return(R,Q); t := X - R; if ABS(t)<ABS(R) then Q:= Q - 1; if t=R then Q:= Q - MOD(FLOOR(MOD(Y,X*10)/X),2); /* equals IP(MOD(MOD(Y,X*10)/X,2)) */ return(R,Q); Sigh. Back to the drawing board.[update: done] Werner 41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE |
|||
04-06-2023, 12:03 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
I added some documentation to pseduo-code, to make algorithm more clear.
Please feel free to correct my errors ... Quote:t := Y/X;If Y/X not close to integer, floor-divide Q is correct. R is floor-mod, always correct, just come for the ride. Quote:t := X - R;Y = Q*X + R = (Q+1)*X + (R-X) = (Q+1)*X + (-t) The rest of the code is to decide remainder(Y,X) = R or -t If remainder is (-t), we had over-estimated Q by 1 Quote:if ABS(t)<ABS(R) then Q := Q - 1;With floor-mod, sign(X) = sign(R) = sign(t) If Z = remainder(Y,X)/X = (-t)/X < 0, then Q over-estimated Example, with a 2 significant digits calculator 80/7 = 11.428... ≈ 11. remainder(80,7) = +3 --> floor-divide Q = 11 81/7 = 11.571... ≈ 12. remainder(81,7) = −3 --> floor-divide Q = 12 - 1 = 11 Quote:if R != t then return (R,Q)If |Z| < 1/2, not half-way case, we are done. Quote:t := MOD(Y,X*10) / X;Q is half-way case, rounded-to-even. OP 2 half-way case example: >(8e11+2) / 4 200000000000 >(8e11+6) / 4 200000000002 Z = ±1/2. We zoom-in to decide Z sign. We could scale by 2, but scale with system base is error-free, simply an exponent shift. This made t numerator calculation exact. (MOD part is exact) t numerator divide by denominator may generate rounding errors, but it does not matter. With half-way case, we expected t = .5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, ... Since we scaled by 10, Z sign from t = +- +- +- +- +- In other words, Z = -1/2 if FLOOR(t) = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 --> Z = 1/2 * (-1)^FLOOR(t) |
|||
04-06-2023, 02:55 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (42S) Quotient and Remainder
Floor-divide may be more useful, in the sense that it is trivial to convert to other kinds.
Code: def sign(x): return (x>0) - (x<0) >>> y, x = 10, 7 >>> funcs = (qr_floor, qr_trunc, qr_ceil, qr_away) >>> args = ((y,x), (-y,x), (y,-x), (-y,-x)) >>> for f in funcs: print f.__name__, [f(*a) for a in args] ... qr_floor [(1, 3), (-2, 4), (-2, -4), (1, -3)] qr_trunc [(1, 3), (-1, -3), (-1, 3), (1, -3)] qr_ceil [(2, -4), (-1, -3), (-1, 3), (2, 4)] qr_away [(2, -4), (-2, 4), (-2, -4), (2, 4)] Truncated quotient, because of symmetry, is easier to implement. It also has the accuracy advantage: y = (qt x) + rt RHS terms have same sign, thus no cancellation errors. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)