Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
|
12-14-2023, 07:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2023 07:52 AM by ThomasF.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
Hi all,
While working on the Blinky emulation, I have once again started to read the VASM listings, not only for the mainframe, but also the printers and time module. To be compatible with other printers, the Blinky ROM must maintain all global entry points used. Not only is there a entry point jump table in the end of the module, but there are also direct entry points into the ROM code, e.g. from the Time module (82182A) into the printer ROM, so these addresses must be kept between the printers (82143, the IL printer 82162 and the Blinky 82242 IR module). When I was reading the Timer VASM looking for calls to the printer I found what I consider is a new bug (at least I can't remember any notes about it), but I have problems verifying this with real hardware since I'm lacking the 82182 Timer module myself. In the Timer VASM the following code snippet was found, it is in the code for the function ALMCAT, printing any alarms on the printer. This code prints the time & date, the reset interval, and then calls the printer to check status and report any errors (BECHK). Code: 73 40 1 GOSUB TMSG PRINT ALARM TIME & DATE This should result in a call to 01737 (octal) in quad 0 of the printer ROM (PL0, @1737 corresponding to 0x63DF). And at the corresponding place in the printer (82162 in this case) it says: Code: ************************************************************************ Notice that the address 1737 does not have a label, like OUTPCT two lines above. This corresponds to address 0x63DD (OUTPCT) and 0x63DF (OUTPCT + 2). This confused me, since the opcode in the Timer ROM (615,1474) which is 0x18D,0x33C and corresponds to "?NC XQ CF63" - since this is not in the printer ROM at page 6 - but could be 0x63CF if read backwards ... !?!? Code: 0615 -> 0 110 001 101 -> 0110 0011 01 --> 6 3 Opcode class 1 The comment says that we should call 1737 in printer rom 0 (PL0) = 0x6000 + 0x0000 + 0x3DF = 0x63DF - (this is the correct address to OUTPCT + 2 which calls the routine BECHK. 0x63CF is close to 0x63DF but not right - and absolutely not backwards ... And all other calls to e.g. OUTPCT are using the normal linkage using the global label, with an empty instruction for the linker to resolve it, but this one is handcoded - and obviously very wrong ... So, my interpretation of this is that if ALMCAT is executed with a printer attached, it would fail if there is some module in page C (port 3) at the same time! This has been confirmed by Mike using his powerful NutEM/PC emulator, but since I don't have a timer module myself I can't verify this on real hardware. The HP-41CX also has the Timer module, but this code is updated and corrected, and works when tested. Could someone who owns a 82182 Timer module check if the following is a correct description of the error? With timer module and a printer attached, but port 3 empty: 1. Enter some alarm, e.g.: Code: [ALPHA] TEST [ALPHA] 3. [XEQ] ALMCAT This should result in that the alarm is printed, and this works since port 3 is empty so the call to 0xCF63 just returns and execution continues without any problem. If we now insert a module in port 3, we probably introduce code at address 0xCF63 (we have tested this with a PPC-ROM in port 3), and execute ALMCAT again. But be warned that this might result in a "MEMORY LOST", since my interpretation is that we would start executing code at 0xCF63 which might result in a corrupt state leading to "MEMORY LOST". Someone made some mistakes when writing this code back in the days, first the wrong address was used (0x63CF (01717) instead of 0x63DF (01737)), but also swapped the two instructions, resulting in a call to 0xCF63. This caused no harm as long as port 3 was empty (or if e.g. the Time module, a printer or HPIL was inserted there since they all are hardwired to other pages). Nor is the call to BECHK really needed, there might be timing issues if a lot of alarms or big load on the printer before calling ALMCAT, but BECHK just wait for output to be printed and then checks for any errors (so normally just returns). Even if the system is over 40 years old, it still amazes me with all bits and pieces that are still to be uncovered and understood so many years after the introduction! Would be great if anyone could confirm this using a real 41C/CV, a printer and the 82182 Time module! Have a nice Xmas season and a great New Year! Cheers, Thomas [35/45/55/65/67/97/80 21/25/29C 31E/32E/33E|C/34C/38E 41C|CV|CX 71B 10C/11C/12C/15C|CE/16C 32S|SII/42S 28C|S 48GX/49G/50G 35S 41X] |
|||
12-14-2023, 08:28 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 07:48 AM)ThomasF Wrote: So, my interpretation of this is that if ALMCAT is executed with a printer attached, it would fail if there is some module in page C (port 3) at the same time! It seems correct. Referring to the Time Module Owners Manual Addendum, May 1982 (that is, only 4 months after the Owners Manual): When printing the alarm catalog, port 3 of the calculator should be empty or contain one of the following accessories only: the HP 82143A Printer, the HP 82160A HP-IL Module, or the time module. Improper operation may occur if another module or accessory is plugged into this port while the Alarm Catalog is being printed. The Addendum can be found on the HP-41 archive site. So definitively not hidden for over 40 years, just little known or forgotten ... Anyway, thanks for the details and explanations about this bug ! J-F |
|||
12-14-2023, 09:05 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 08:28 AM)J-F Garnier Wrote: So definitively not hidden for over 40 years, just little known or forgotten ... Thanks for the reference J-F! Never seen or at least dropped from my memory (which is worst?) - but good to know that my conclusion was spot on ... Cheers, Thomas [35/45/55/65/67/97/80 21/25/29C 31E/32E/33E|C/34C/38E 41C|CV|CX 71B 10C/11C/12C/15C|CE/16C 32S|SII/42S 28C|S 48GX/49G/50G 35S 41X] |
|||
12-14-2023, 06:54 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
This addendum is already incorporated into page 93 of my scan of the manual here:
https://literature.hpcalc.org/items/472 However, because it is probably easily missed, I have added it as a separate download here (plus now it should come up more easily on searches for the part number): https://literature.hpcalc.org/items/2532 |
|||
12-14-2023, 07:40 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 06:54 PM)Eric Rechlin Wrote: I have added it as a separate download here (plus now it should come up more easily on searches for the part number): Great, with the part number and print date now. Matter of fact, the HP-41 archive site also included the addendum within the manual, but an addendum with an earlier print date of 02/82 (otherwise similar). This means the bug was identified very soon after the time module introduction. I have my original French manual with the corresponding addendum in French too, bought in 1983. At the time I was a bit discontented to get such an expensive module with a bug. That may be the reason why I remembered there was an addendum about a bug (but I didn't remember what it was precisely before checking). J-F |
|||
12-14-2023, 10:18 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
Did they fix it in CX Time?
|
|||
12-15-2023, 02:32 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 10:18 PM)brouhaha Wrote: Did they fix it in CX Time? Yes, in Thomas's long post above, he noted "The HP-41CX also has the Timer module, but this code is updated and corrected, and works when tested." --Bob Prosperi |
|||
12-15-2023, 07:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2023 07:39 AM by ThomasF.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 10:18 PM)brouhaha Wrote: Did they fix it in CX Time? Hi Eric, Yes, as mentioned, later versions work, and to verify I had a quick look into a later version of the Timer ROM (TIME-3A), and there the label ACT135 from TIME-1C and the failing call is removed all together. First of all because it was wrong, then probably also because it was not a global entry point and since the call was not needed. The call to wait for the printer is also explicitly called when OUTPCT (paper advance) is called at the beginning of each loop i.e. for each new alarm to be printed. Code snippet from ALMCAT (starting at 0x5806) in TIME-3A: Code: ... Cheers, Thomas [35/45/55/65/67/97/80 21/25/29C 31E/32E/33E|C/34C/38E 41C|CV|CX 71B 10C/11C/12C/15C|CE/16C 32S|SII/42S 28C|S 48GX/49G/50G 35S 41X] |
|||
12-15-2023, 08:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2023 08:14 AM by J-F Garnier.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-15-2023 07:37 AM)ThomasF Wrote: I had a quick look into a later version of the Timer ROM (TIME-3A), and there the label ACT135 from TIME-1C and the failing call is removed all together. TIME 3A ? The "official" known time ROMs are the TIME 1C (time module for the CV) and the TIME 2C (embedded time ROM in the CX). This TIME 3A is for sure not from HP, and not from the same era. J-F |
|||
12-15-2023, 08:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2023 08:56 AM by ThomasF.)
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-15-2023 08:12 AM)J-F Garnier Wrote: This TIME 3A is for sure not from HP, and not from the same era. Hi J-F, Thanks for your correction! I found the TIME-3A.ROM, but maybe this is something completely different ... it looked very much like time Time Module when I disassembled the ALMCAT function in it. I just assumed it was a ROM-dump from a later version of Time module or CX. (There is a lot of ROMs floating around - but very little documentation about them ...) Edit: The TIME-3A ROM was found found on the 41CL page (https://www.systemyde.com/zip/rom_files_231126.zip), so maybe an updated ROM to suit the CL. I'm sorry if this is something else, and I will trace and disassemble my good old CX when I get home. Cheers, Thomas [35/45/55/65/67/97/80 21/25/29C 31E/32E/33E|C/34C/38E 41C|CV|CX 71B 10C/11C/12C/15C|CE/16C 32S|SII/42S 28C|S 48GX/49G/50G 35S 41X] |
|||
12-15-2023, 09:54 AM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
TIME-3A (or -3B) is definitely the HP41-CL version, it has the extra functions at the end of the FAT
Regards, Meindert |
|||
12-15-2023, 11:55 AM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
Hi again,
Sorry for the confusion regarding the ROM version of the Time module! I have now checked with a "-TIME 2C" ROM in a HP41CX, and the dumped code section in the original post is identical to the one in this CX. The code section correspond to address 0x581C to 0x5836 in both ROM's. So the original post is still valid, and at least in respect to the ALMCAT function, both TIME 2C and 3A are identical (but with additional functions added in the 3A version as Meindert mentioned). Cheers, Thomas [35/45/55/65/67/97/80 21/25/29C 31E/32E/33E|C/34C/38E 41C|CV|CX 71B 10C/11C/12C/15C|CE/16C 32S|SII/42S 28C|S 48GX/49G/50G 35S 41X] |
|||
12-19-2023, 10:14 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Another bug hidden for over 40 years ... ?
(12-14-2023 06:54 PM)Eric Rechlin Wrote: This addendum is already incorporated into page 93 of my scan of the manual here: In the same way, there is an addendum for the Extended Function/Memory module 1B (for the CV). Probably many of us are using physical or emulated 41CX with embedded XF-2D for which the addendum is no more relevant, but my CV has still a XF-1B module in it, and it seems the corrected version 1C is somehow rare - even a powerful user/collector doesn't have it The addendum is available on the hp41 archive site. The most notable and annoying bug is : "After a file in extended memory is purged, there is no working file. [...] you should always define a working file before executing functions that operate on it; otherwise, all files in extended memory will be lost". J-F |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)