Woodstocks completed :)
|
01-25-2014, 08:40 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Woodstocks completed :)
Finally got a complete line of working Woodstocks by putting my hands on a cute little HP-29C. Playing with it - hey, was programming primitive then! Nevertheless, Woodstocks are the family of calculators I like best from a design (not design! ) point of view: a geometry which fits my hands very well, a weight feeling right, a very nice keyboard, and quite a solid packaging. In a way, I love it.
Now I should turn to my 19C waiting for overhaul / repair for some years. Geoff, what happened to your book project? d:-) (Yes, I know of that terrific charger design - although I don't remember that bothered me and my 25C back in the Seventies at all. Continuous memory was a great step! About the only thing I missed was an L.R. function - with that, it would have suited my demands perfectly; I definitly wouldn't have looked at any Spice and hardly bought an 11C.) |
|||
01-25-2014, 08:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-25-2014 08:57 AM by Massimo Gnerucci.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Woodstocks completed :)
(01-25-2014 08:40 AM)walter b Wrote: Finally got a complete line of working Woodstocks by putting my hands on a cute little HP-29C. Playing with it - hey, was programming primitive then! Nevertheless, Woodstocks are the family of calculators I like best from a design (not design! ) point of view: a geometry which fits my hands very well, a weight feeling right, a very nice keyboard, and quite a solid packaging. In a way, I love it. Congratulations Walter. The last Woodstock I found to have a complete set was a 27, twelve years ago. And yes, Geoff: where's the book? Greetings, Massimo -+×÷ ↔ left is right and right is wrong |
|||
01-26-2014, 05:19 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Woodstocks completed :) | |||
01-26-2014, 05:52 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Woodstocks completed :)
(01-26-2014 05:19 PM)walter b Wrote:(01-25-2014 08:56 AM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote: Congratulations Walter. Other interests prevailed, it seems. Greetings, Massimo -+×÷ ↔ left is right and right is wrong |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)