DM41L at work
|
01-06-2016, 07:21 AM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work | |||
01-06-2016, 08:09 AM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
I don't remember height limit, just that there is an artificial limit.
The velocity limit is supersonic from memory which airliners can never reach, at least not without crashing. - Pauli |
|||
01-06-2016, 08:26 AM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
okay,
lots of responses and I will ignore the language associated ones. English is my second language, I don't have a first language unfortunately. Paul and HrastProgrammer
Walter, may be impractical but still usable. I wrote these for the 41CL in 1986 while on the DC-10. The largest on board computer on that airplane had 4K worth of memory. The 41CX saved a lot of time! For a thorough explanation of these programs including formulae and etc. see my presentation for HHC2013: HP calculators in aviation
So while one can get by without the calculator and the routines, life sure is easier with it. So I disagree with your friends analysis of 'impractical'. For all those commenting on stuff in the flight deck not locked down. These photos were for demonstration purposes here during a smooth flight. The calcs reside in my flight bag. I have yet to be hit by flying HPs over the last 40 years of flying! Cheers and happy new year! Geoff p.s. I am getting used to the keyboard layout even though it may violate the sensibilities of some |
|||
01-06-2016, 08:45 AM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 08:09 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: The velocity limit is supersonic from memory which airliners can never reach, at least not without crashing. Well, there was one supersonic airliner some years ago, and there was already a 41 inside: Concorde's pocket calculator HP-41CV. For details about the calculator usage on the Concorde see here and here. |
|||
01-06-2016, 08:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2016 08:53 AM by Geoff Quickfall.)
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
Pauli,
SST was supersonic and a Canadian Pacific DC 8 on a test flight ten years before the SST was also taken supersonic (greater then Mach 1) cp dc8 supersonic link Cheers |
|||
01-06-2016, 08:53 AM
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 08:26 AM)Geoff Quickfall Wrote: [*]the DC10! that brings back memories but substitute the HP 48 with my 41CX running the same programs the DM 41L is shown to have loaded plus a few more like critical point, point of no return, optimum altitude, anti skid inop, full lido flight plan with printer capability plus a few others. That HP-48GX has been running my HP-41X emulator used to execute various HP-41 software, including the ASTRONAV which Antoine has been developing, enhancing and updating for 30+ years ... https://www.hrastprogrammer.com/hrastwood/ https://hrastprogrammer.bandcamp.com/ |
|||
01-06-2016, 08:55 AM
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 08:45 AM)Didier Lachieze Wrote:(01-06-2016 08:09 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: The velocity limit is supersonic from memory which airliners can never reach, at least not without crashing. interesting links, thanks Didier! |
|||
01-06-2016, 09:41 AM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 06:54 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: I don't remember the specific values, but commercial GPS units have an altitude and a velocity limit beyond which they won't produce a position. I don't know if commercial airliners reach the altitude limit or not, I doubt they reach the velocity limit. I played with my tomtom satnav on various flights. I used it to record gps tracks. It had no problem with speed and altitude. It did get confused trying to recalculate the route though, jumping from road to road and recalculating all the time. So I had to stop navigation and everything was fine. |
|||
01-06-2016, 01:02 PM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 08:26 AM)Geoff Quickfall Wrote: For all those commenting on stuff in the flight deck not locked down. These photos were for demonstration purposes here during a smooth flight. The calcs reside in my flight bag. I have yet to be hit by flying HPs over the last 40 years of flying! I was fairly certain of this! I still am waiting for the day I board Air Canada and hear that you are the pilot of my flight! |
|||
01-07-2016, 06:45 PM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-06-2016 08:09 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: I don't remember height limit, just that there is an artificial limit.Interesting. According to the ever-reliable Wikipedia the limit is 1000kts at an altitude of 18km or more, to prevent the use of C/A code receivers in ballistic missiles. |
|||
01-07-2016, 08:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2016 08:30 PM by Geoff Quickfall.)
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
Best I have done is 728kts (1348 km/hour) on the B777 at Mach .86 but I didn't have the portable running. The onboard GPS (all three) had us at 728kts and they are commercially available.
We were at FL330 in the POLAR jet stream from Beijing to Vancouver with a 190 knot tail wind. Smooth as glass. Geoff Sanjeev, if you or anyone else hears my name, send up a business card or note to the flight deck via a flight attendant. |
|||
01-07-2016, 11:55 PM
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-07-2016 08:29 PM)Geoff Quickfall Wrote: Best I have done is 728kts (1348 km/hour) on the B777 at Mach .86 but I didn't have the portable running. The onboard GPS (all three) had us at 728kts and they are commercially available. Some competition? My fastest was 288kts tailwind overhead Shefferville, resulting in about 760kts (1407Km/h) at Mach 0.82 on the old horse B707. From Winnipeg to Cologne, most probably at FL 370. Sorry no GPS in the late 70's. Speed cross checked with INS and VORTAC. It wasn't smooth at all, more like participating in a Rodeo at Calgary. Günter PS: Vancouver, Geoff? |
|||
01-08-2016, 12:15 AM
Post: #33
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
You win,
Working on a second tier list as the four big conference hotels were prohibitively expensive. Not to worry, also remember, the dollar is 70 cents to the US dollar, so big savings there. Will have updates to the committee soon. Cheers. |
|||
01-08-2016, 10:55 PM
Post: #34
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work | |||
01-19-2016, 08:43 PM
Post: #35
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
Hi Geoff!
I really like your dm41l in situation. I am also a pilot, and I would like to know where I can get the program you use in your plane if possible. Thy Adrien |
|||
01-01-2017, 11:41 AM
Post: #36
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
(01-19-2016 08:43 PM)Soroban Wrote: Hi Geoff! Same goes for me. I found some options, i.e. the aviation module for the HP41 and a 41 emulator for the iphone. But I would prefer a calculator based solution for quick calculations, as mobiles are not allowed in all enviroments (military pilot). I already own a wp34s which supports 42s programms. Is it possible, to port the aviation module programs to a 42s format? Best regards, Max |
|||
01-03-2017, 04:55 PM
Post: #37
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
Hello!
(01-06-2016 06:54 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: I don't know if commercial airliners reach the altitude limit or not, I doubt they reach the velocity limit. I don't fly airliners but business jets. "Mine" can fly at 45.000ft which is higher than most airliners can reach, because of cabin pressurisation limits: It is a lot easier to build a light pressure vessel in small size than large. I have not come across a GPS unit, be it dedicated aviation, automotive, smartphone or tablet, which can not handle this elevation and the associated speeds. Regards Max |
|||
02-16-2018, 04:12 PM
Post: #38
|
|||
|
|||
RE: DM41L at work
This post was linked to in a Facebook group that I recently joined.
OK, it's from 2 years ago but I thought I'd just comment on a couple of things: (01-04-2016 01:02 PM)Geoff Quickfall Wrote: Not so plus: 1 was fixed in firmware V25. 2 was fixed in firmware V24. 3 was half fixed in V25. There just isn't enough RAM on the LPC1115 chip used in the DM41(L) to provide the full 600 registers of X-Mem. However, by reorganising various parts of the firmware it has been possible to add one X-Mem module's worth of extended memory so V25 gives you 362 registers of it instead of the original 124 that are provided with the X-Func module. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)