Math Notation
|
09-10-2017, 11:03 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Math Notation
ALL
Since math notation is a recuring sub-topic in numerous threads, I thought the following reference ... [attachment=5166] ... might be of some small significance. an excerpt from the front matter: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cajori, Florian, 1859-1930. A history of mathematical notations / by Florian Cajori. p. cm. Originally published: Chicago : Open Court Pub. Co., 1928-1929. "Two volumes bound as one." Includes indexes. Contents: v. 1. Notations in elementary mathematics - v. 2. Notations mainly in higher mathematics. ISBN 0-486-67766-4 (pbk.) 1. Mathematical notation-History. 2. Mathematics-History. 3. Numerals-History. 1. Title. QA41.C32 1993 5101.148-dc20 93-29211 BEST! SlideRule |
|||
09-11-2017, 12:24 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Math Notation
1928-1929...
I thought they still spelled out formulas in complete sentences in those days :-) |
|||
09-11-2017, 01:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-11-2017 02:02 AM by SlideRule.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Math Notation
(09-11-2017 12:24 AM)AlexFekken Wrote: 1928-1929... Okay, so it's a HISTORY up til the mid 1900's ... might it still be apropo? If the date is problematic, try something more modern; [attachment=5167] or [attachment=5168] or [attachment=5169] as well as the older but relevant a History of Mathematical Notation vI or vII. BEST! SlideRule |
|||
09-11-2017, 06:55 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Math Notation
(09-10-2017 11:03 PM)SlideRule Wrote: ALL Dear All, for all those who are interested in the history of mathematics, both volumes bound as one can be downloaded as PDF free at this URL Best regards Karl |
|||
09-11-2017, 09:36 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Math Notation
Thanks for sharing (sometimes I miss a button to say "thanks" instead of adding +1 to my postcount)
Wikis are great, Contribute :) |
|||
09-11-2017, 10:49 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Math Notation
(09-11-2017 01:18 AM)SlideRule Wrote: Okay, so it's a HISTORY up til the mid 1900's ... might it still be apropo? If the date is problematic, No, I would not call it problematic: probably makes the book all the more interesting, especially for people who think that mathematical notations and conventions are, or should be, set in stone. So thanks for sharing... |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)