On the format of the output of fMax
|
06-27-2014, 12:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2014 04:29 PM by Alberto Candel.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
On the format of the output of fMax
In CAS, the input fMax(f(x),x=a..b) returns a sequence consisting of the numbers x between a and b where the function f attains a Max value. For example, fMax(x^2, x=-2..2) returns -2,2. However, if there is just one such value x, it returns seq[x], like fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) returning seq[2].
Why not just 2, or even better, {2} (or {-2,2} above)? Some of my Adv Calc students have a Prime (because I suggested it to them) and at first could not understand the "seq[x]" thing. (As Helge points out below, there was a typo. I have replaced fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) with fMax(x+1,x=-2..2).) |
|||
06-27-2014, 01:50 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
Not sure what you are meaning to say, and there must be a typo somewhere in the OP, because fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) is non-sensical and returns an error message for me "Bad argument value."
fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) returns 2 (correct). I don't get the seq[.] output at all. |
|||
06-27-2014, 04:27 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
The output of fMax is a sequence, that is a list of values without delimiters. Since you could not make the distinction between a sequence of one element and the element, the sequence is printed with seq[ ... ] if there is one element inside.
|
|||
06-27-2014, 04:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2014 04:31 PM by Alberto Candel.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
(06-27-2014 01:50 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Not sure what you are meaning to say, and there must be a typo somewhere in the OP, because fMax(x+1,x=-2,2) is non-sensical and returns an error message for me "Bad argument value." Yes, there was a typo. Fixed it. Thanks! But I do get seq[2]. Maybe we have different settings somewhere in the Prime system? |
|||
06-27-2014, 05:26 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
Yes, we must have different CAS settings.
I have angle measure: rad, number format: std, integers: dec, simplify: min, exact, use sqrt, principal, use i checked. The second settings page probably doesn't matter. [By the way, it would be neat, if at some point in the future fMin and fMax could be expanded to also find minima and maxima in two (or more) dimensions . . . just dreaming]. |
|||
06-27-2014, 07:53 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
(06-27-2014 05:26 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Yes, we must have different CAS settings. well, i have the same settings as you, but still get seq[.]. |
|||
06-27-2014, 08:51 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax | |||
06-27-2014, 09:09 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
After purge(x):
fMax(x+1,x=-2..2) results in seq[2] At first the "error: Bad Argument" result was received because x had a previous value. I used purge to remove the x variable before this would work. -Dale- |
|||
06-28-2014, 04:53 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
(06-27-2014 05:26 PM)Helge Gabert Wrote: Yes, we must have different CAS settings. well, i have the same settings as you, but still get seq[.]. |
|||
06-28-2014, 06:11 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax
seq[...] is displayed if textbook display is not checked.
|
|||
06-28-2014, 02:36 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: On the format of the output of fMax | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)